Blood Purification
Twentieth century medicine taught that blood
is sterile, this despite countless blood tests aimed at determining
the medical condition of patients, everything from Rh factor to
measurements of blood components and sedimentation rates to immune
function tests, tests for malaria and Lyme Disease to febrile agglutination
tests, cancer marker tests, viral load tests, and AIDS tests, not
to mention the highly sophisticated tests discussed by Bill Moyers
on NOW that showed the presence of dozens of industrial chemicals,
toxic metals, and strange hormones.
If blood were sterile, a precious student of mine
would be alive today. She, however, died of HIV-infected blood
used during a surgical procedure at one of the most prestigious
hospitals in the country. So, perhaps it's time to stop talking
about the sterility of the blood and discuss what is wrong with
blood.
"Detoxification" is
a term belonging to the language of natural medicine, but the seed
I would like to plant in your thinking is that we are precariously
poised between factors that could undermine our well being and
measures that could enhance our quality of life and perhaps our
longevity. Life expectancy is a highly esoteric field of
inquiry so I prefer to focus on qualitative experiences rather
than quantitative ones. This also takes one outside the normal
scientific world where the success and failure of various protocols
are often described on the basis of how long a person lives from
date of diagnosis to death. This information is interesting
and important, but, as I said, it's not my area of expertise.
I prefer to view each moment as a separate experience
and to think that each experience is moving us more in the direction
of degeneration or more towards regeneration. I discuss this
concept on my newest web site, moldmisery.com. Unless
one accepts that there are ramifications for each action, one may
not consider the actions thoroughly enough. I am trying to
put forth information and thoughts that will encourage deeper involvement
in the treatment process and hopefully therefore more control over
the experiences . . . and perhaps also the outcome, but my personal
beliefs do not really support this mode of evaluation so, once
more, I want to be clear that my interest is in the quality of
life, what we make of our opportunities and experiences, not the
results that follow.
Sometimes the concepts of natural
medicine and conventional (allopathic) medicine are worlds apart.
When one studies widely in both schools, there can be a lot of
confusion, but with my exposure to darkfield microscopy—sometimes
called live blood analysis— "detoxification" and "purification" became
visible and I owe at least part of my own recovery from a very
serious encounter with a lady spider to the insights I was provided
into how my blood was affected by the venom as well as neurotoxins.
Unfortunately, this kind of microscopy is not very well understood
in the U.S., but in the German-speaking world, where I have spent
some time in the last years, it is extremely popular.
In darkfield microscopy, one is able
to observe "live blood."
Unlike electron microscopy, no fixative is used and there is no
bombardment of the sample so one is able to observe not only what
is in the blood but the behavior of the blood, and this is truly
fascinating. Technically speaking, darkfield microscopy is
proton microscopy, but it's not important to understand this, merely
that one has the opportunity to see the shape and condition of
the red blood cells, the functioning and interests of the white
blood cells, and, unfortunately, ever so much foreign matter in
the blood.
Actually, this should not surprise
anyone. Again, I am trying to be informative, not critical,
but we know that blood chemistry changes, and we should realize
that it changes because of what is moving in the blood. We
know, for instance, that alcohol and sugar go into the blood stream
very fast and we ought to be clear that hormones, food, medications
and supplements, as well as pollutants find their way into the
blood stream through ingestion, inoculation (with pharmaceutical
drugs or insect bites), and inhalation. We know this so we know
that blood is not a simple substance but rather just as complex
as life itself.
Because I am an astrologer, my first
experiences looking through the eye pieces of the microscope were
like looking at the microcosm and I often felt like I was falling
into inner space. Sometimes, it felt very personal, like
I was getting to know someone through the struggles waged in this
badly misunderstood tissue. Yes, blood is a tissue, not a
fluid. Well, okay, there is a liquid but the red blood cells
are suspended in the plasma. In addition to the erythrocytes,
there are many kinds of white cells, platelets, and other objects,
varying from microorganisms to parasites to chemicals and complex
compounds.
Hematology is a very complex subject,
not to mention microbiology and parasitology, so I want to keep
it simple.
Red Blood Cells
Erythrocytes are discoids, not spheres. They
look somewhat like donuts except that there is a depression in
the middle rather than a hole. They can vary somewhat in
size from one person to another but all the red blood cells in
a single individual ought to be the same size. If some are
larger and others are smaller, there is a problem.
RBCs work very hard. They assimilate
nutrients and transport food and oxygen throughout the body. If
they are malnourished, the ingredients needed to maintain health
and repair damaged tissues will be lacking. This leads to
degeneration because cells die and have to replaced and this job
cannot be performed well if there are deficiency conditions. Hungry
red blood cells have little bull's eyes in the middle. I
think this is because they are thin and the light comes through
the thinner part of the RBCs. Many cancer patients have lots
of these target cells.
So, first off, RBCs need good nourishment. They
need minerals to maintain the hemoglobin, not just iron but many
minerals, and fat to keep the outer membrane in tact. When
they are weak, they are vulnerable to infection and one sees RBCs
that have infection on the surface of the cells as well as inside.
When the RBCs deliver their payloads,
they pick up the waste and carbon dioxide. Most of this is
expelled in the lungs which is why so many patients have weakness
in the lungs and why good air, proper breathing, and some support
for detoxification are important.
In my work with the microscope, I
have seen every kind of toxicity, including a lot of dead cells
following not just chemotherapy and irradiation but also some IV
protocols and zapping or the more sophisticated Rife technologies. All
this debris has to be disposed of. Usually, it is consumed
by white blood cells: they eat the bacteria and spray something
on parasites to dissolve their skin. I had seen this with
my own eyes so I know they do this, but they can also be overwhelmed
and my sense is that they prioritize well.
For instance, it is well known in
some circles that the immune system will attack an infection before
turning its attention to cancer. Therefore, if a patient
has a chronic infection, as for instance due to a dental
problem, the white blood cells will be tied up with the emergency
and other problems will have to wait. Think of them like
firemen. If there is one fire, everyone slides down the pole
and jumps on the wagon and goes to the fire, but if six fires are
burning simultaneously, there might not be enough resources to
handle all six emergencies so some buildings are going to burn
down. I am not saying it is this simple; but it's totally
obvious to my eyes that white blood cells are completely aware
of the work that needs to be done, but some of the work exposes
them to so much toxicity that they die and sometimes, they are
just overwhelmed.
The more patients do to lighten the
load, the easier it is for white blood cells do their jobs. I
believe that pH balance,
really good quality cooking and salad oils, as well as herbal supplements
that enable the white blood cells to detoxify, support healing
by releasing some of the resources of the body from emergency management
to deeper issues. What I found helps is dietary simplicity: stay
away from the smorgasbords and buffets and hang out more with your
juicer. Various clinics have juice protocols that they believe
to be necessary; I think some people need to fast on green juices
for three days but after that, two big glasses of very fresh juice
are usually enough to supply the nutrients and take some pressure
off the digestive system. Enzymes are needed to break down
tumors so one needs to have some reserves. By eating food
that has high nutrient benefits and low digestive stress, some
enzymes are freed for critical work.
I'm in my sixties so I have been
around for a while and I've read a lot. There are credible
accounts of people who have healed simply from diet, but there
are others who healed after relying on other strategies so I am
not a fanatic. I like to explain things as clearly as possible
and then encourage people to think and make their own decisions: don't
copy someone else and don't ask me to tell someone what to do. This
said, I would encourage people to look into a few very special
diets with a track record.
The first is the Johanna Brandt grape
cure. I actually know a few patients who had the will power
and fortitude to stick to this diet and I was amazed by the results,
but it's a difficult option. Next, there is the master cleanse
of Stanley Burroughs and the three-day mucusless diet of Dr. John
Christopher. Both have merits. Then, there are some
diets that are a little more long-term: the Moerman diet from
Holland, the Johanna Budwig regime from Germany, the Rudolf Breuss
diet from Austria, the Max Gerson diet used in several clinics
in Mexico but seldom in his native Germany, and the Body Ecology
diet, a relatively new one but it is more do-able than many others;
and since compliance is an important factor, easier diets have
some merit. You note that I did not include the Macrobiotic
diet or some of the other more eccentric diets, largely because
my experience is that people are very resistant to change so they
need food that tastes and feels good to them. Personally,
I am interested in Ayurvedic diets but they require more patient
education as well as initiation into the world of spices.
I become upset with "one size
fits all" approaches to anything. First, I don't believe
there is such a thing as a single strategy and secondly, it's often
more a question of the quality of the food and ability to assimilate
what is eaten than the selection of food. This said, I have
opinions on some matters but will limit my comments right now to
organic and fresh. If you can grow the food yourself and
juice it or cook it minutes after harvesting, it's great. If
there is a local farmer's market, that is fine too. If you
can contract with someone to grow food specially for you, that's
okay also; and, if you have to buy produce in a supermarket or
order it online, that's also a solution, but eat food that is nutritious
and as natural as possible. I am not going to cite reams
of research. Someone else can do that work. I just
want to say that the body is 100% organic; and it can only be nourished
and repaired with organic food: end of argument.
For the last 15-20 years, I have
been telling people that the simplest change anyone can make in
the kitchen is to substitute an excellent quality oil for the dreadful
commercial oils in wide use. Approximately 15-30% of our
calories come from oil and who knows how much rancidity, oxidative
stress, and chemical toxicity are related to the use of poor oils. I
have to say that I have almost never succeeded in convincing anyone
that oils are this important. I don't know why this message
is so hard to put across, but I usually feel like I am wasting
my breath. This said, I believe one can make a 30-50% improvement
in diet just by using proper oils. Imagine that! No
one has to change any recipes, just the bottles. Oils must
be organic and cold-pressed.
This topic will be continued . .
.
Copyright by Ingrid Naiman 2006