Introduction to Food Section
Eating habits are deeply affected
by cultural and family traditions, aesthetic and taste preferences,
efficiency measures most of us rely on to one degree or other,
finances, and increasingly what we have come to learn or believe
as a result of spiritual and health consciousness.
Anthropology was my favorite department
in university. Having a Sagittarius Moon, I love the way
minds of anthropologists work, the non-judgmental manner in which
observers recognize and describe cultural differences and the attributes
that are unique to different groups around the world. Personally,
I am stimulated by travel, variety, and the exquisite foods that
define the culinary expertise of peoples around the world.
My father was a meat and potatoes
man and my mother was a gourmet cook who has to have been bored
to tears serving meals to my father. Eventually, I learned
to shed the influences of my father but I cut my own path so did
not wind up a clone of my mother either. However, like her,
I did a lot of entertaining until returning from my stints with
the State Department. I was living in Hawaii, the land of
potluck dinners and food neuroses and swore I would never again
go to the trouble of cooking for so many idiosyncratic individuals. It
was the height of the guru movement and people who had grown up
on TV dinners were becoming vegetarians, fruitarians, and breathtarians. Others
were experimenting with mono diets, fasts, and countless extremes
involving consumption or abstinence to demonstrate self-discipline,
freedom from the world of the senses, or higher consciousness. Saturn
was transiting Cancer and I thought the obsessions would eventually
pass, but the truth is, America was changed forever . . . and for
this, I am partly grateful but also dismayed.
As I became more and more deeply
involved in health, I listened to arguments and after reeling for
a while tried to form my own conclusions. For instance, I
had become a vegetarian for compassionate reasons. My mother
was hurt and guilt-tripped me by saying that if while I was growing
up she had fed me the way I was feeding myself, I would never have
grown up. As it was, my Swedish clansmen had nicknamed me
"Shrimp" because I was a bit smaller than some of kinfolk. The
chiropractor with whom I worked for more than seven years said
that I would develop mental problems due to vitamin B12 deficiencies. I
panicked and succumbed occasionally to some temptations at luaus,
but each time I did so, I broke a tooth. This was becoming
quite expensive so the third time it happened, I concluded the
Universe was trying to show me something, and it was time to listen.
I
reflected on my time with the State Department in India and realized
that all the most erudite, well-balanced, and gracious individuals
I had met in India were vegetarians. Ergo, it must be safe
to be a vegetarian; and, even tofu is not necessary. This
is important because tofu substitutes were first shown to me at
a special banquet when I was the food analyst at the U.S. Trust
Company. Wall Street was being told that soy is the food
of the future so "invest now." Gandhi, however,
was totally unable to get Indians to eat soy beans, and how fortunate
for India that these genetically modified crops have not taken
over the landscape of the subcontinent.
It's very difficult to stand back
far enough to see what really happened to the generations that
grew up on hot dogs and hamburgers. I think the current melée
was greatly influenced by marijuana farming because most urbanites
did not learn to garden until they became interested in psychedelic
plants. Whatever one's personal history and opinions, I am
certain that modern herbalism owes much to the consciousness movement
and its excursions with drugs. I confess that fascinated
as I was with the trips others related, I was never curious enough
to play roulette with my brain; I think I felt that if I went out
on a limb, I wanted to know there was a way back. Three decades
later, I have less opinion than before; and I now believe there
are political and financial reasons for criminalizing behavior
that is far less dangerous than countless things that are legal. I
will not, however, go into all this because it inflames people
in ways that are seldom constructive. Suffice it to say that
many green thumbs were unfolded in fields with magical plants so
I am grateful there was a consciousness revolution to which we
are all heirs and beneficiaries.
To understand how I got where I am,
I have to tell a few more tales. I returned from Asia in
a state in which it was essential to reinvent myself. I don't
know if I ever was conventional, but by age 30, I certainly had
no intention of trying to fit in anywhere but the place of my own
choosing. I was done with costumes one wears to work, done
with big government and its abuse of power, done with predatory
corporations and their plundering, done with mainstream medicine. The
question was: what next? I spent nearly a year and
a half in meditation and was blessed with all sorts of clairvoyance
and insights. You must understand that the inner world was
so intriguing that "reality" did not have
much appeal. Where food was concerned, I watched food frenzies
in others but aside from my determination to eat harmlessly, I
did not consider myself a fanatic. Thus, when I started to
have clients, I was sometimes put into a dither when they complained
that when they consulted an astrologer, they expected to see someone
of higher consciousness, not someone who drank coffee. To
appease them, I gave up coffee for 18 months until a little bell
tinkled in my head that reminded me that some of my greatest heroines
in my metaphysical explorations were famous for their coffee.
The long and the short of this is
that I did not bother to find out whether coffee or anything else
affected my consciousness. In fact, I was convinced I would
be exactly the same regardless of what I ate or drank. Basically,
I think this is true if you are in touch with yourself, but it
is not true when you are lost.
By 1980, I was deeply involved with
Ayurveda and the concept of metabolic balance through digestibility. All
the theories of Ayurveda made perfect sense to me; they interface
well with astrology; and they are almost impossible to reconcile
with fad diets, including the Blood Type Diet. It worked,
however, for me that each person is born with a constitutional
type and therefore has specific systems of the body that are better
developed than other systems. This supported the insights
into chakras that I had while meditating, and it gave me a handle
on complex issues that were challenging to patients and practitioners.
The 80s were grounding for me. I
was living in Santa Fé; everything was exciting. It
felt like I imagined Paris to have been in the late 1800s. I
was sure that if Degas or Chopin or even Marie Curie were alive
again, they would be living in Santa Fé. I started
to feel a little less like a quiet observer and eternal student
and more like there were creative forces in me working their way
to the surface. I became interested in genius and creativity
and why mathematicians and musicians discover their talents so
early in life and politicians, philosophers, and doctors do their
best work when their peers have retired. My astrology teacher
died at the age of 97, but I never expected to live that long so
I thought I better start writing.
My first book, still unpublished,
was on music therapy, but it's really about memory. The next
was on astrology and cancer, and then I began work on Kitchen
Doctor. To
make this understandable to others, you have to think about what
I really do in a consultation. Normally, people begin with
a need to tell their stories. Where cancer is concerned,
you can imagine that the astrologer is often one of the last people
consulted, after the oncologists, food pundits, and even after
the aura balancers. By this time, many people have been around
the world in search of cure and their stories take a while to tell. I
was always listening on many levels, trying to find the common
denominators among those who heal and those who do not as well
as therapies that work and one's that do not.
So, I had heard about adventures
with the Macrobiotic diet and Gerson diet and Kelley regime and
so on and so forth from patients, none of whom were well . . .
because if they were well, they would have written a book telling
their story and never have found the need to see a medical astrologer.
Now, if one were working in a clinic
providing a number of services, including dietary guidance, I am
sure the picture looks quite different from what it looked like
to me, and I was fully able to appreciate that many people might
benefit from diets that fail for others. As I said, what I
love about Ayurveda is that one does not have to get into the one
size fits all rut. This said, books were coming out, everything
from Diet for a Small Planet to books on the acid-alkaline
balance. By 1990, I found the issues of what constitutes
an appropriate cancer diet inescapable. I hired a patient
to research the matter, and we wrote a book together (that was
taken from my house and never returned.)
My idea was a bit theatrical. I
had a sort of visual image an oversized, misshapen character accompanied
by Sherlock Holmes with his magnifying glass. They go into
the kitchen and open cupboards. Holmes reads labels and removes
everything with chemical preservatives, harmful dyes, MSG, and
so on and so forth, and the giant puts the prohibited items into
a big black bag. On the way out, he grabs the microwave oven,
aluminum pots, and expired vitamins. That's just day one,
but it's a good start.
There are some matters on which even
the most disparate voices agree: no refined carbohydrates, no processed
foods, and no cocktails. After this, there is not all that
much accord. I think rational people would choose fresh,
organic food, but there are a countless paid pundits who challenge
this, but they look rabid to me; and frothing more at the mouth
and shouting louder has failed to convince me that commercial foods
are safe for people who are ill. We have to keep in mind
that research is channeled through big institutions that depend
on grants. These, in turn, are awarded on the basis of consensus
and this consensus is sought in mainstream circles where thinking
outside the box is probably not only discouraged but punished. Ergo,
there is a lot of bad "science" to sift through so it's
best to rely on outcome and even some Senators are now talking
about the need for outcome research because the multi-billion dollar "war
on cancer" is not being won. Guess what? It never
will be won if this means no renewal of grants.
I am not a cynic; in fact, I'm an
optimist, but it's important to get out of the box in order to
think clearly and see things as they are. Then, one can get
a grip on reality and do something about one's circumstances. Every
patient knows that if they go to an oncologist, there will be conventional
and predictable recommendations and maybe discouraging statements
made about alternatives. Likewise, if you go to a dietitian,
you will get supplements; but an herbalist will pitch the vitamins
and suggest herbs. Once you see how limited the training
is, you should be able to give yourself permission to explore. Think
of it as you would other kinds of shopping. If you have definite
taste in clothes and furniture, you expect to go to several stores
before finding what you want.
The patient I hired to research the
cancer cookbook used to say, "I hate things that are Xeroxed." I
asked her what she meant. She said, she didn't want to wear
something that looked like what everyone else was wearing. This
is good. It means that she didn't get stuck in a very sensitive
teenage dilemma of how to gain peer approval and she went on to
craft her own identity; however, you can only avoid the copies
if you seek out handmade articles. Whether one is talking
about clothing or food or medicine, there is home grown food, usually
found in farmer's markets, and artisan herbal tonics made in small
quantities in wonderful laboratories that really know how to source
good plant materials. If you are seeking your own Path, you
will find a fit if you keep looking, but you must look.
The approach I was using to the cookbook
was basically Ayurvedic, and it relied on the digestibility of
foods. This
was not the exclusive twist, but it was the underlying concept. I
believe that most people with cancer have slow metabolisms. Doctors
sometimes jump when I say this because the site where the tumor
is located usually has excessive metabolic activity, but this is
unique to that part of the body: the digestive system is
usually weak, meaning that the patient does not produce enough
hydrochloric acid, enzymes, insulin, bile, etc., etc. Balance
therefore depends on eating foods that are easier to digest, or
one can supplement with pills, but it is actually probably better
to learn what can be readily metabolized and what produces bloating,
distension, discomfort, mucus, and maybe flatulence. For
instance, meat is hard to digest but tempeh is fermented and thus
predigested. It
is easy to digest. Likewise, dairy products, especially cold
milk, cheese, and ice cream, are hard to digest, but yoghurt and
kefir and quark have cultures that aid digestion. Though
I have not seen studies, I suspect, that camembert is easy to digest
because the hyphae have penetrated deep into the cheese and softened
the cheese in preparation for delivering it to the mold. I
am not saying to eat moldy cheese; I am just suggesting that we
observe food and learn what we can and cannot digest.
Alcohol is basically a sugar and
is usually on the list of prohibited foods, but I think a little
red wine is okay, but I always have trouble communicating correctly
what "a little" means. I think it means 2-4 glasses
per week, not per night! Most beer is dreadful, but there
are flavonoids in some bitter beers like Guinness so sometimes
one does not need to abstain so much as to choose carefully
and wisely.
There might even be a few aperitifs
that are not so bad. In Europe, I found some wonderful ones
made of black walnuts. I actually tested them on blood parasites
and I think the old monks were onto something. The brand
I found was even called L'Hermitage. There are also some
great digestive bitters. In this country, we usually find
Campari but very seldom Cynar. We can also find Jägermeister
and Gammal Dansk but rarely my personal favorite which is Appenzeller
Bitter. Explore! Besides the familiar Angostura and
Pernod, we have Unterberg, Fernet Branca, and countless other gentian-based
bitters that can make it possible to remain sociable without turning
cancer into a recipe for isolation.
As the days progress, I will keep
adding to this introduction, but I felt I needed to start by giving
some of my background. Then, you can judge for yourself whether
to pay any attention to what I write on food or whether to go with
Johanna Budwig, Rudolf Breuss, or one of the other authoritative
authors in the field of cancer diets. This said, I want to
say, we are not pioneers. Hildegard of Bingen had recipes
for patients . . . that was 800 years ago so we have to see that
we have been really slow to connect the dots and take charge of
our own wellness.
I'm always a little iconoclastic
so you have to take that into account; but even in my
zeal for reform, I still know how to compromise because I have
found that compliance increases when diets are more congenial. I
do not think will power feels good to the subconscious so austere
diets that appeal to the brain may not be nourishing to the body
if the body feels that "mind over matter" is a tyrant. I
try to help facilitate a body-mind
connection so if I find a way
to prompt creative changes, I will stay closer to the middle lane
and not so far off to the left or right. For instance, some
people will be very tough sounding on the issue of oil, but I think
we should talk about the quality of oil, not the common oils that
are often as not associated with free radicals and oxidative
stress.
. . . to be continued